Cases 61 - 70 of 41,961
Lacy v. Villalobos, Jr.
as 4:2024cv00471
Petitioner:
Antonio Maurice Lacy
Respondent:
Moises Villalobos, Jr. and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cooper v. Eastland County Sheriff
as 4:2024cv00273
Petitioner:
Jason Derrell Cooper
Respondent:
Eastland County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. Warden, FCI Three Rivers
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Nevon Barnes
Defendant:
Warden FCI Three Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kindred v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00125
Petitioner:
Herman Lee Kindred
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peterson v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Gary Glenn Peterson
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Vallez v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00122
Petitioner:
Evone Vallez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
James v. Smith
as 7:2024cv00069
Petitioner:
Torrence James
Respondent:
Mr. FNU Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salinas v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01917
Petitioner:
John Thomas Salinas
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shepard v. Brazos County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2024cv01913
Petitioner:
Tyrone Radale Shepard
Respondent:
Brazos County Sheriff Department and Wayne Dicky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hernandez v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00168
Petitioner:
Karen Noemi Hernandez
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
