General Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 71 - 80 of 6,306
Motamoros-Santillan v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00085
Petitioner: Irma Motamoros-Santillan and Irma Matamoros-Santillan
Respondent: Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garcia Jaime v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00135
Plaintiff: Ingrid Mariela Garcia Jaime
Defendant: Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pelayo v. Keyes (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00033
Plaintiff: Glenn Bonilla Pelayo
Defendant: R. D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Agho-Allen v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00101
Petitioner: Itohan Agho-Allen
Respondent: Warden Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gholston v. Crabtree (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff: Ronald Gholston
Defendant: Chadwick Crabtree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pettway v. McClain et al
as 1:2024cv00075
Plaintiff: Mikel Dewayne Pettway
Defendant: Captain Antonio McClain and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Calloway (INMATE 3)
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff: Silas Martin
Defendant: Rolanda Calloway
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2254 Civil Forfeiture
Hicks v. Horton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00063
Petitioner: Dalton Hicks
Respondent: Jonathan Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pettway v. McClain et al
as 2:2024cv00137
Plaintiff: Mikel Dewayne Pettway
Defendant: Antonio McClain and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jacinto v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00084
Petitioner: Monica E. Galvan Jacinto
Respondent: Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?