General Cases filed in Kentucky
Cases 71 - 80 of 4,258
Walker v. Warden Roby L.L.C.C.
as 2:2023cv00174
Petitioner: Darrin Walker
Respondent: Warden Roby L.L.C.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coplen v. USP McCreary We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00222
Petitioner: Antwan Elvago Coplen
Respondent: Warden of USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lang v. Jones
as 3:2023cv00605
Petitioner: James Ellis Lang
Respondent: Ladeidra N. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Swaney We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00214
Petitioner: Steven Williams, Jr.
Respondent: G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alsip v. Warden David Paul
as 5:2023cv00337
Petitioner: Hachelle Alsip
Respondent: Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lewis v. Swaney
as 6:2023cv00190
Petitioner: Damon S. Lewis and Damon Steven Lewis
Respondent: G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sloan v. Court
as 6:2023cv00204
Petitioner: Claude Gene Sloan
Respondent: Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Evans v. Bunnell
as 5:2023cv00338
Petitioner: Aaron Evans
Respondent: Judge Kimberly Bunnell and Jailer Steven Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Warden Roby L.L.C.C.
as 3:2023cv00649
Petitioner: Darrin Walker
Respondent: Warden Roby L.L.C.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Troxell v. Jordan
as 6:2023cv00184
Petitioner: Destil Eugene Troxell
Respondent: Warden Scott Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?