Cases 81 - 90 of 238
GLADNEY v. LUTHER et al
as 2:2018cv02966
Petitioner:
JEFFERY GLADNEY
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT JAMEY LUTHER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF (PENNSYLVANIA) and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VEASY v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2018cv02457
Petitioner:
WILLIE VEASY
Respondent:
TAMMY FERGUSON, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LEWIS v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2018cv02449
Petitioner:
JAMAL LEWIS
Respondent:
TAMMY FERGUSON, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2018cv01744
Petitioner:
LEANDER WILLIAMS
Respondent:
CAPOZZA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. SUPERINTENDENT, SCI SOMERSET et al
as 2:2018cv00313
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT, SCI SOMERSET, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Petitioner:
GEORGE WILLIAMS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. MAHALLY et al
as 2:2017cv05809
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER SMITH
Respondent:
LAWRENCE P. MAHALLY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KEYES v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2017cv00325
Petitioner:
MALCOLM KEYES
Respondent:
M.D. OVERMYER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WOODARD v. SMITH et al
as 2:2017cv05330
Petitioner:
CRAIG WOODARD
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KEYES v. OVERMEYER et al
as 2:2017cv05312
Petitioner:
MALCOLM KEYES
Respondent:
MICHAEL OVERMEYER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COTTLE v. LUTHER et al
as 2:2017cv04725
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY COTTLE
Respondent:
JAMEY LUTHER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF SOMERSET, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF KATHLEEN KANE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
