Cases 81 - 90 of 90
Barrientes v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2009cv00845
Petitioner:
Jeremy K Barrientes
Respondent:
Joseph M Arpaio and Arizona Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medley v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2008cv02389
Petitioner:
Laura L Medley
Respondent:
Joseph M. Arpaio and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Templar v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2008cv02216
Petitioner:
L S Templar
Respondent:
Joseph M Arpaio and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Owens v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2008cv01307
Petitioner:
Charles Ray Owens
Respondent:
Joseph M. Arpaio, Terri L. Clarke and Larry Terra
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pym v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2008cv01126
Petitioner:
Mario Pym
Respondent:
Joseph M. Arpaio, Arizona Attorney General, State of and Adult Probation Department
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jenkins v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2008cv00557
Petitioner:
Emanuel Keon Jenkins
Respondent:
Joseph M. Arpaio and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hernandez v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2007cv01712
Petitioner:
Omar Hernandez
Respondent:
Joseph M. Arpaio and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plummer v. Arpaio
as 2:2007cv01629
Petitioner:
Robert M Plummer
Respondent:
Joseph M. Arpaio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rhoades v. Arpaio, et al
as 2:2007cv01250
Petitioner:
Adrian Allan Rhoades
Respondent:
Joseph M. Arpaio and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leimone v. Arpaio
as 2:2007cv00025
Petitioner:
Daniel Louis Leimone
Respondent:
Joseph M. Arpaio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
