Cases 81 - 90 of 156
Darryl Bernard Watts v. Tom L Felker
as 2:2008cv00861
Petitioner:
Darryl Bernard Watts
Respondent:
Tom L Felker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Antwan Maurice Lewis v. Tom Felker
as 2:2008cv00799
Petitioner:
Antwan Maurice Lewis
Respondent:
Tom Felker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Felker
as 2:2008cv00256
Petitioner:
Marquiest Leon Murphy
Respondent:
Tom Felker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lawrence Carlton Smith v. Tom Felker
as 2:2008cv00565
Petitioner:
Lawrence Carlton Smith
Respondent:
Tom Felker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fletcher v. Carey et al
as 4:2008cv00287
Petitioner:
Shawn Fletcher
Respondent:
Tom Carey and Board of Prison Terms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mr. Kevin Dyas v. Mr. Tom Felker
as 2:2008cv00247
Petitioner:
Kevin Dyas
Respondent:
Tom Felker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lancaster v. Carey et al
as 2:2008cv00051
Petitioner:
David Gene Lancaster
Respondent:
Tom L. Carey, J.A. Nuehring, N. - Fry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jayne v. Bosenko et al
as 2:2008cv00032
Petitioner:
Michael Aaron Jayne
Respondent:
Tom Bosenko and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tavare Stefin v. James Tilton et al
as 2:2007cv08324
Petitioner:
Tavare Stefin
Respondent:
James E Tilton and Tom Felker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Motion to Extend Time to File
Michael Woolen v. Tom Felker
as 2:2007cv08161
Petitioner:
Michael Woolen
Respondent:
Tom Felker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
