General Cases filed in Maine
Cases 81 - 90 of 259
KIMBALL v. STATE OF MAINE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00526
Petitioner: RICHARD KIMBALL
Respondent: STATE OF MAINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STERGIOS v. USA
as 2:2015cv00490
Petitioner: CHARLES D STERGIOS
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROBERTS v. LIBERTY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00449
Petitioner: DANIEL ROBERTS
Respondent: RANDALL LIBERTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOFLAND v. LIBERTY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00414
Petitioner: RANDALL B HOFLAND
Respondent: RANDALL LIBERTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DEGENNARO v. STATE OF MAINE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00381
Plaintiff: PETER DEGENNARO
Defendant: STATE OF MAINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HINES v. STATE OF MAINE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00378
Petitioner: JOHN T HINES
Respondent: STATE OF MAINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BEAUCHENE v. HARPER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00354
Plaintiff: DONALD BEAUCHENE
Defendant: JAY HARPER, RIVERVIEW PSYCHIATRIC CENTER and MARY MAYHEW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DEMOS v. UNITED STATES PRESIDENT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00284
Plaintiff: JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR
Defendant: UNITED STATES PRESIDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
INMAN v. LANDRY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00243
Plaintiff: FRANK INMAN
Defendant: SCOTT LANDRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BATHGATE v. LANDRY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00221
Petitioner: PETER GEORGE BATHGATE, II
Respondent: SCOTT LANDRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?