Cases 81 - 90 of 8,833
Lenhart v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority
as 1:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
Christopher Lenhart
Respondent:
Ohio Adult Parole Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nurein v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2023cv03936
Petitioner:
Mohamed Nurein
Respondent:
Warden, Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schubert v. Watson
as 2:2023cv04231
Petitioner:
Alan Schubert
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Huffman v. Warden Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
as 2:2024cv00269
Petitioner:
David Warren Huffman
Respondent:
Warden Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marshall v. Moore
as 1:2024cv00012
Petitioner:
Juanito Marshall
Respondent:
Warden Rochelle Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Caupp v. Parin
as 3:2024cv00009
Petitioner:
Matthew Christopher Caupp
Respondent:
Captain Parin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lewis v. McConahay
as 1:2023cv02254
Petitioner:
Deonte Lewis
Respondent:
Warden Tim McConahay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Acosta v. McConahay
as 1:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Jonathan Acosta
Respondent:
Warden Tim McConahay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hogan v. Henderson
as 1:2023cv02279
Petitioner:
Tremain Hogan
Respondent:
Warden Kim Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mobarak v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv00143
Petitioner:
Soleiman Mobarak
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
