Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Terrell v. Calhoun
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Morris Andre Terrell
Defendant:
Sheriff Unknown Calhoun
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Morris v. United States
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Darrell Ray Morris
Defendant:
United States
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Terrell v. Turner
as 5:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Morris Andre Terrell
Defendant:
Lee Turner
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Edwards v. Sollie et al
as 3:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
Tito M. H. Edwards
Defendant:
Billy Sollie, Officer Morris and Officer Spencer
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Morris v. Jackson
as 3:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Morris
Defendant:
Donald Jackson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. Doe
as 3:2022cv00618
Plaintiff:
Steven Morris
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Morris v. Cain et al
as 3:2022cv00280
Plaintiff:
Christopher Morris and Christopher Jermaine Morris
Defendant:
Burl Cain and Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Allred v. Morris
as 4:2021cv00148
Petitioner:
Bobby Allred
Respondent:
Timothy Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edwards v. Morris
as 4:2021cv00104
Petitioner:
Lucas Edwards
Respondent:
Timothy Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allred v. Morris
as 3:2021cv00510
Plaintiff:
Bobby Allred
Defendant:
Timothy Morris
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
