Cases 1 - 10 of 115
Moore v. State of South Carolina
as 4:2024cv01753
Petitioner:
Charles B. Moore, Jr.
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crittendon v. Greenville County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2024cv00681
Petitioner:
Timothy B. Crittendon
Respondent:
Greenville County Sheriff's Department, Director Greenville County Detention Center, Greenville County Solicitor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jamison v. Warden Peeples
as 9:2023cv03401
Petitioner:
Andra B Jamison
Respondent:
Warden Peeples
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haltiwanger v. Warden Turbeville Correctional Institution
as 6:2022cv03769
Petitioner:
Gerald B Haltiwanger, Jr
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Warden Turbeville Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Regassa v. Dunbar et al
as 8:2022cv00466
Petitioner:
Admassu Regassa
Respondent:
Warden R.S. Dunbar, AWR Wilson, Ms. B. White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sanchez v. Fox
as 2:2021cv02236
Petitioner:
Rodrigo Hernandez Sanchez
Respondent:
John B Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lawrence v. Wingfield
as 4:2021cv02166
Petitioner:
Melvin P. Lawrence
Respondent:
B. Wingfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smalls v. Stirling et al
as 2:2021cv02025
Petitioner:
Demetrius Jarod Smalls
Respondent:
Director B Stirling and Warden K Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Evans, II v. Wallace
as 2:2021cv01973
Petitioner:
Kenneth B Evans, II
Respondent:
Warden Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Patton v. Wingfield
as 1:2021cv01762
Petitioner:
Jermaine Tyrell Patton
Respondent:
B. Wingfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
