Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Jackson #301450 v. Unknown Party
as 2:2023cv00389
Petitioner:
Ramond Curtis Jackson
Respondent:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Shinn et al
as 3:2022cv08216
Petitioner:
Randolph A Jackson, Jr.
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson #301450 v. Shinn
as 2:2022cv01343
Petitioner:
Ramond Curtis Jackson
Respondent:
David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Shinn et al
as 4:2022cv00164
Petitioner:
William Michael Jackson
Respondent:
David Shinn and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv02208
Petitioner:
Alawisuces Monta Jackson
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson #166465 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv01503
Petitioner:
Rex Lee Jackson
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Arizona, State of et al
as 3:2021cv08187
Petitioner:
Jerald Jackson
Respondent:
Arizona, State of, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv01151
Petitioner:
Collie Ray Jackson, Jr.
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson #267521 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv01665
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Trenton Timothy Jackson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Attorney General of the State of Arizona
as 2:2020cv00943
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Darien Maurice Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
