Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Lohmeier v. Eishen
as 0:2024cv00941
Defendant:
Mr JOHN HAROLD LOHMEIER, Pltf
Petitioner:
John H. Lohmeier
Respondent:
B. Eishen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Solberg v. Eischen et al
as 0:2023cv03589
Petitioner:
John M. Solberg
Respondent:
B. Eischen, J. Kozulla, S. Hachey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Solberg v. Eischen et al
as 0:2023cv03568
Petitioner:
John M. Solberg
Respondent:
B. Eischen, J. Kozulla, S. Hachey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Graham v. Gilley
as 0:2023cv02036
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
Warden John Gilley and John Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barse v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2022cv02877
Petitioner:
Lawren John Barse, Sr.
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Husten v. Collins et al
as 0:2022cv02347
Petitioner:
Michael John Husten
Respondent:
Brian Collins, Paul Schnell and Rebecca Holmes-Larson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Ellison
as 0:2022cv02144
Petitioner:
Chester V. Jones
Respondent:
Keith Ellison, John Choi, Agent Drew Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martin v. Collins
as 0:2022cv00872
Petitioner:
John Steven Martin
Respondent:
Brian Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frazer v. United States
as 0:2021cv02763
Petitioner:
John J. Frazer
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Husten v. Schnell et al
as 0:2021cv01722
Petitioner:
Michael John Husten
Respondent:
Paul Schnell, Ray Bosch and Roy Bosch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
