Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Johnson v. Dunbar
as 5:2022cv03677
Petitioner:
Phillip Randolph Johnson, Jr
Respondent:
R S Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Banshee v. McMaster et al
as 6:2021cv02602
Petitioner:
Mansa M Y Banshee
Respondent:
Henry McMaster, Bryan Stirling, South Carolina Department of Probation Parole Pardon Services The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Voltz-Loomis et al v. McMaster et al
as 5:2020cv01533
Petitioner:
Allen Slaughter, Jeanne Voltz-Loomis, Jane Roes 1 through 10 and others
Respondent:
Mollie Dupriest Taylor, Dan Batson, Christopher F Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Williams
as 6:2019cv01576
Petitioner:
Mykel Johnson
Respondent:
Randolph Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mixson v. Waid et al
as 0:2018cv02626
Defendant:
Randolph Waid, Alexander McDold and Micheal Cross
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mark Mixson
Respondent:
Alexander McDonald and Chad B. Simpson
Petitioner:
Daniel Mixson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ashford v. Stephan
as 0:2018cv01262
Petitioner:
Randolph Ashford
Respondent:
Michael Stephan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baird v. Chapman et al
as 1:2011cv01217
Petitioner:
Randolph Stephen Baird
Respondent:
Aril Chapman and Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Randolph v. McCall et al
as 1:2011cv00817
Petitioner:
Gabriel Randolph
Respondent:
Michael McCall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bryan v. Stevens et al
as 1:2010cv02106
Petitioner:
Terence Terell Bryan
Respondent:
Warden Stevens, Mylinda D Nettles, Debra Ginn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Randolph v. Bodison
as 3:2010cv00162
Petitioner:
Linart Randolph
Respondent:
McKiether Bodison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
