Cases 1 - 10 of 258
Pete v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv02271
Petitioner:
Andrew Pete
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv01740
Plaintiff:
Andrew Garcia, Jr.
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Apodaca v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00093
Petitioner:
Victor Andrew Apodaca
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00073
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00123
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00124
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
Andrew Garcia, Jr.
Respondent:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Apodaca v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00108
Petitioner:
Victor Andrew Apodaca
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMillan v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00038
Petitioner:
Andrew McMillan
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
