Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Botello v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
Daniel Angel Botello
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hernandez v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00954
Petitioner:
Angel Hernandez and Angel Santiago Hernandez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Montez v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00530
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Montez
Respondent:
Angela Chevalier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moorman v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2023cv00124
Petitioner:
Angel Moorman
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Navarro v. Warden Rivers of FCI Seagoville
as 3:2023cv00035
Petitioner:
Juan Angel Navarro
Respondent:
Warden Rivers of FCI Seagoville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv00031
Petitioner:
Angel Humberto Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lara v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv03517
Petitioner:
Jose Angel Lara
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medina v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv03185
Petitioner:
Angel Medina
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv00459
Petitioner:
Alvaro Angel Rodriguez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Acha Jimenez v. Lacy et al
as 4:2022cv00282
Petitioner:
Angel Eduardo Acha Jimenez
Respondent:
Robert Lacy, Jr., Sylvester M. Ortega, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
