Cases 1 - 10 of 127
Johnson v. Warden Davis
as 5:2024cv01137
Petitioner:
Trejuan Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Anthony Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Davis
as 1:2024cv00663
Petitioner:
Kiaran Young
Respondent:
Warden Anthony Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cunningham v. Warden Madsion Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv00291
Petitioner:
Anthony J Cunningham
Respondent:
Warden Madsion Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gause v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 3:2024cv00007
Petitioner:
Anthony E Gause
Respondent:
Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hargrove v. Warden Healy
as 4:2023cv01857
Petitioner:
Terrell Anthony Hargrove
Respondent:
Warden Ian Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. Foster
as 3:2023cv00366
Petitioner:
Anthony S. Davis
Respondent:
Warden Corey Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fields v. Davis
as 1:2023cv00239
Petitioner:
Kurtis Fields
Respondent:
Warden Anthony Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bard v. Davis
as 5:2023cv00202
Petitioner:
David Paul Bard
Respondent:
Warden Anthony Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Filing Error
as 1:2023cv00100
Petitioner:
Anthony L Viola and Anthony L. Viola
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Branch v. Davis
as 4:2022cv01962
Petitioner:
Marcus Alexander Branch
Respondent:
Warden Anthony Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
