Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Cruz-Colin #193913 v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2024cv01306
Petitioner:
Eleazar Cruz-Colin and Adrian Gonzalez Cruz
Respondent:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cisneros v. Ryan et al
as 4:2019cv00275
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
Oscar Adrian Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hernandez v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv00413
Petitioner:
Adrian Hernandez
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Bruno Stole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Villa-Inzunza v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv00740
Petitioner:
Eslyn Adrian Villa-Inzunza
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
White v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv01212
Petitioner:
Adrian White
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barron v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2015cv02493
Petitioner:
Adrian A Barron
Respondent:
Arizona Department of Corrections Time Computation Unit, Arizona, State of and Arizona Board of Executive Clemency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vasquez v. Ryan et al
as 2:2014cv00896
Petitioner:
Adrian Vasquez
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adrian #150015 v. Ryan
as 2:2013cv01920
Petitioner:
Martin Sarmiento Adrian
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Van Leeuwen v. Ryan et al
as 2:2012cv02231
Petitioner:
William Adrian Van Leeuwen, Jr.
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crihalmean #236344 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2012cv01483
Petitioner:
Adrian Crihalmean
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
