General Cases filed in Virginia
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Meyers v. Bailey
as 2:2024cv00360
Plaintiff: David Meyers
Defendant: Warden Mack Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Unknown
as 1:2021cv00736
Respondent: Unknown
Petitioner: Theodore Roosevelt Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crawford v. Bailey We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00527
Defendant: Mack Bailey
Plaintiff: Tevaris Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bailey v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2020cv00284
Respondent: Warden
Petitioner: Maurice Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bailey v. Kiser
as 1:2018cv01260
Respondent: Jeffrey Kiser
Petitioner: Kentray Devon Bailey
Interested Party: Jonn O. Iweanoge, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bailey v. Riverside Regional Jail Authority
as 1:2018cv00895
Respondent: Riverside Regional Jail Authority
Petitioner: Christina Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bailey v. Harold W. Clarke, Director We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00052
Petitioner: Jared Benjamin Bailey
Respondent: Harold W. Clarke, Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Walton v. Ray We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00474
Petitioner: Bruce Duane Walton
Respondent: Mr. Tracy Ray and Matt Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bailey v. Warden, River North Correctional Center
as 3:2017cv00408
Petitioner: Donald Ray Bailey, Jr.
Respondent: Warden, River North Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bailey v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00706
Petitioner: Brent Scott Bailey
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BOP Director Samuels, DSCC Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?