General Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bowers v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00581
Respondent: Warden
Petitioner: Reginald Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOWERS v. G.E.O. CORP./INC. et al
as 1:2018cv03281
Petitioner: EUGENE BOWERS
Respondent: FERRELL OWENS, G.E.O. CORP./INC. and J. FRENCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOWERS v. WARDEN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00271
Petitioner: EUGENE BOWERS
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOWERS v. SUPERINTENDENT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01695
Petitioner: EUGENE BOWERS
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOWERS v. BROWN
as 2:2016cv00152
Petitioner: EUGENE BOWERS
Respondent: RICHARD BROWN
Miscellaneou: WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOWERS v. BROWN
as 2:2016cv00148
Petitioner: EUGENE BOWERS
Respondent: RICHARD BROWN
Miscellaneou: WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOWERS v. BROWN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00382
Petitioner: EUGENE BOWERS
Respondent: RICHARD BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOWERS v. BROWN
as 2:2011cv00324
Petitioner: EUGENE BOWERS
Respondent: DICK BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOWERS v. BASINGER
as 2:2011cv00064
Respondent: J. BASINGER
Petitioner: EUGENE BOWERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOWERS v. WARDEN
as 1:2007cv00164
Petitioner: EUGENE BOWERS
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?