Cases 1 - 10 of 226
Henry v. Perez et al
as 6:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Roman J. Henry
Defendant:
Sergio Perez, Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01415
Petitioner:
Joel Garcia Nunez
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arellano v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv02116
Petitioner:
Wilberto Arellano
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sewell v. Collier
as 7:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Larry Gene Sewell
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Collier - TDCJ Director
as 6:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Tracy Lynn Jackson
Respondent:
Bryan Collier - TDCJ Director and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. Collier
as 1:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Holston Banks, III
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robertson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Laneil Robertson
Respondent:
Bryan Collier, Michael W Collier, Jennifer S Crozby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gaines v. Collier
as 3:2024cv00457
Petitioner:
Ernest Edward Gaines
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Massey v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Ross Massey
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reedy v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00069
Petitioner:
Charles Reedy
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
