Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Martin v. Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2023cv12454
Petitioner:
Deana Martin
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barboza v. United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2020cv11137
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Jerome Barboza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Santaniello v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2020cv30027
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Ralph Santaniello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Warner v. Spaulding et al
as 1:2018cv10850
Petitioner:
Luke Jospeh Warner
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding, Berhan Yeh, Federal Medical Center Devens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Joost v. US Probation, Rhode Island et al
as 1:2017cv10448
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Joost
Defendant:
US Probation, Rhode Island, US Probation, Massachusetts, US Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ross v. Spaulding et al
as 3:2014cv30123
Petitioner:
Danny Ross
Respondent:
S. Spaulding and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stierhoff v. Anderson et al
as 1:2010cv11078
Petitioner:
Neil Stierhoff
Respondent:
Erik Anderson, Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Joost v. Grondolsky et al
as 4:2010cv40088
Petitioner:
Robert M. Joost
Respondent:
J. Grondolsky and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Young v. Grondolsky et al
as 4:2010cv40089
Petitioner:
Joseph B. Young
Respondent:
J. Grondolsky and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Burgess v. Grondolsky et al
as 4:2010cv40028
Plaintiff:
Jefferson Burgess
Defendant:
J Grondolsky, FMC, Devens and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
