Cases 1 - 10 of 69
QUINN v. JOHNSON STATE PRISON
as 5:2024cv00163
Participant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Petitioner:
RANDALL TULLY QUINN
Respondent:
Warden CURTIS CARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CARTER v. SHAW
as 5:2023cv00403
Petitioner:
JARED RANDALL CARTER
Respondent:
JASON SHAW and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Shaw
as 4:2023cv00299
Petitioner:
Jared Randall Carter
Respondent:
Jason Shaw
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Coweta County Superior Court et al
as 3:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
Bobby C. Carter
Defendant:
Coweta County Superior Court, Kenneth Cooke and District Attorneys D.A.'s Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwin v. Carter
as 3:2022cv00104
Petitioner:
Ricardo Keith Edwin
Respondent:
Sidney Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Owen v. Carter
as 1:2022cv03397
Petitioner:
Ogbebor Owen
Respondent:
Acting Warden Sidney Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. Carter
as 1:2021cv04720
Petitioner:
Torrey Coleman
Respondent:
Katrina Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carter v. Geter
as 2:2020cv00058
Respondent:
Linda Geter
Petitioner:
Jerry Carter, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CARTER v. WHITE
as 5:2019cv00343
Petitioner:
JERROD A CARTER
Respondent:
WARDEN JERMAINE WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CARTER v. ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA
as 4:2019cv00003
Petitioner:
DAVID CARTER
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA and ASHLEY NILOC RILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
