General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Joseph Luney v. Deborah Hickey, et al
as 13-6137
Petitioner - Appellant: JOSEPH ANTHONY LUNEY
Respondent - Appellee: DEBORAH A. HICKEY, Warden, Federal Medical Center in Lexington, Kentucky added per D.E. 4
Respondent: JACK CONWAY, for the Commonwealth of Kentucky added per D.E. 4
Cantoni v. LaClair We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv04353
Petitioner: Greg Cantoni
Respondent: D.E. LaClair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joe v. Office of the Attorney General
as 12-1297
Petitioner - Appellant: Joe Delroy, AKA Delroy Joe
Respondent - Appellee: D.E. LaClair
Defendant: Office of the Attorney General State of New York, New York City Police Department, Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York and others
Platero v. LaClair
as 9:2012cv00381
Petitioner: Bryan K. Platero
Respondent: D.E. LaClair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. LaClair
as 10-3666
Petitioner - Appellant: John Adams, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee: D.E. LaClair, Superintendent, Franklin Correctional Facility
Adams v. LaClair
as 9:2009cv01384
Petitioner: John Adams, Jr.
Respondent: D.E. LaClair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. LaClaire We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv03501
Petitioner: Todd Robinson
Respondent: D.E. LaClaire and D.E. LaClaire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. LeClair
as 1:2009cv04870
Petitioner: Joseph Watson
Respondent: D.E. LeClair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cestalano v. LaClair
as 1:2009cv00280
Petitioner: Eduardo Cestalano
Respondent: D.E. LaClair
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robertson v. LaClair
as 9:2009cv00014
Petitioner: Philip Robertson
Respondent: D.E. LaClair
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?