Cases 1 - 10 of 20
BARAJAS v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv20101
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ BARAJAS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CANO v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv03821
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO JAVIER CANO
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SERRANO v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv02920
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO ALVARADO SERRANO
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SERRANO v. KNIGHT
as 1:2023cv00924
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO ALVARADO SERRANO
Respondent:
STEVIE M. KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DEMOSCOSO v. JOHNSON
as 2:2018cv03826
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO DEMOSCOSO
Respondent:
STEVEN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBINSON v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2018cv01580
Petitioner:
DARIAN ROBINSON
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LOPEZ-NEGRON v. ORTIZ
as 1:2016cv09075
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO E. LOPEZ-NEGRON
Respondent:
DAVID ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RODRIGUEZ-FRANCISCO v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2016cv08137
Petitioner:
JUAN C. RODRIGUEZ-FRANCISCO
Respondent:
D. ORTIZ , JORDAN HOLLINGSWORTH and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NAVARRO v. SHARTLE
as 1:2013cv07613
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO RIVERA NAVARRO
Respondent:
J.T. SHARTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MUNOZ-VALDEZ v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2012cv07745
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO MUNOZ-VALDEZ
Respondent:
JORDAN R. HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
