Cases 1 - 10 of 59
QUERENDONGO v. SCOTT KLINEFELTER et al
as 2:2023cv03737
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO QUERENDONGO
Respondent:
SCOTT SCOTT KLINEFELTER, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DISTRICT ATTY'S OFFC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LORA v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2023cv00034
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO LORA
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
LEMUS v. SORBER et al
as 2:2021cv04354
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO JAVIER LEMUS
Respondent:
JAMIE SORBER, ESQ. DEBORAH RYAN, A.G. JOSH SHAPIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodriguez-Francisco v. Thompson et al
as 1:2021cv01179
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Rodriguez-Francisco
Respondent:
B. Thompson, Herman Quay, III and The Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rodriguez-Francisco v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv01180
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Rodriguez-Francisco
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PRIETO-GARCIA v. PISTRO
as 2:2021cv00051
Respondent:
KEVIN PISTRO
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO PRIETO-GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SANCHEZ v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2020cv00739
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO SANCHEZ
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD PROBATION AND PAROLE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MIDDLEBROOK v. QUINTANA
as 2:2020cv00339
Respondent:
FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA
Petitioner:
ROBERT A. MIDDLEBROOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Arroyo v. Beasley
as 4:2019cv00772
Petitioner:
Francisco Arroyo, Jr.
Respondent:
Gene Beasley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SEPULVEDA-ALDECOA v. LUTHER et al
as 5:2018cv03842
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS, PA. and SUPERINTENDENT: J. LUTHER
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO J. SEPULVEDA-ALDECOA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
