Cases 1 - 10 of 146
Garza v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv01457
Petitioner:
Christopher A. Garza
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garza v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00481
Petitioner:
Thomas Jeffrey Garza
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2023cv03381
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
Richard Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rios v. Lubbock County Sheriff's Office, et al
as 5:2023cv00137
Petitioner:
John Gabriel Rios
Respondent:
Lubbock County Sheriff's Office, Lynn County Sheriff's Office, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garza v. Salazar
as 5:2022cv01313
Petitioner:
Gilbert Diaz Garza
Defendant:
Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garza v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID;
as 2:2022cv00221
Petitioner:
Jose Fidencio Trevino Garza
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garza v. Lumpkin
as 7:2022cv00333
Petitioner:
Jose F. Garza
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garza v. Lumpkin Example:
as 4:2022cv03106
Petitioner:
Jose F. Garza
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garza v. Bexar County
as 5:2030cv07002
Plaintiff:
Lauren Garza
Defendant:
Bexar County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alvarado v. Judge Garza
as 6:2022cv00018
Petitioner:
Victoriano Cruz Alvarado
Respondent:
Judge Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
