Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Nichols v. litscher et al
as 1:2017cv00662
Petitioner:
James S Nichols
Respondent:
john litscher, Wisconsin Department of Justice and J.B. Van Hollen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Murphy, Wayne v. J.B. Van Hollen
as 3:2015cv00504
Petitioner:
Wayne D. Murphy
Respondent:
J.B. Van Hollen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller, Anthony v. Van Hollen, J.B.
as 3:2014cv00887
Petitioner:
Anthony Todd Miller
Respondent:
J.B. Van Hollen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jurjens, Ralph v. Van Hollen, J.B.
as 3:2014cv00462
Petitioner:
Ralph H. Jurjens, III
Respondent:
J.B. Van Hollen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Covington, Reo v. Pollard, William et al
as 3:2013cv00420
Petitioner:
Reo L. Covington
Respondent:
William J. Pollard and J.B. Van Hollen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Godwin, Roger v. Haines, Tim et al
as 3:2013cv00339
Petitioner:
Roger Dale Godwin
Respondent:
Tim Haines , Edward F. Wall and J.B. Van Hollen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ohlinger, John v. Meisner, Michael
as 3:2011cv00799
Petitioner:
John David Ohlinger
Respondent:
J.B. Van Hollen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. WI Probation and Parole Dept. et al
as 3:2010cv00228
Respondent:
James D. Caldwell, Jr., J.B. Van Hollen, La. Probation and Parole Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Grams
as 3:2009cv00725
Petitioner:
Rodney C. Moore
Respondent:
Gregory Grams and J.B. Van Hollen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harkreader v. HEPP et al
as 3:2008cv00630
Petitioner:
Robert James Harkreader
Respondent:
Randall Hepp and J.B. Van Hollen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.