Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Chilton v. State of Missouri 36th Judicial Circuit Butler
as 1:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
Brett Michaels Chilton
Respondent:
State of Missouri 36th Judicial Circuit Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HOWELL v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MO et al
as 4:2019cv02343
Respondent:
Troy Doyle, 21# JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT and St. Louis County MO
Petitioner:
Cruz Howell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HOWELL v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MO et al
as 4:2019cv02008
Defendant:
Troy Doyle, St. Louis County MO and 21# JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT
Petitioner:
Cruz Howell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HOWELL v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MO et al
as 4:2019cv02009
Defendant:
Troy Doyle, St. Louis County MO and 21# JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT
Plaintiff:
Cruz Howell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. 22nd Judicial Circuit Court of Missouri
as 4:2014cv01430
Petitioner:
Rafael Jones, Sr.
Respondent:
22nd Judicial Circuit Court of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Awe v. 45th Judicial Court of Pike County
as 4:2014cv00929
Petitioner:
Kenneth V. Awe
Respondent:
45th Judicial Court of Pike County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Barnett v. Judicial System of Buchanan County
as 4:2011cv00363
Petitioner:
Brandon Barnett
Respondent:
Judicial System of Buchanan County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dyer-El v. Torrence et al
as 4:2010cv02331
Petitioner:
Atiim-Enahara Dyer-El
Respondent:
Timothy Torrence, Steven R. Ohmer, Jennifer M. Joyce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dyer-El v. Torrence et al
as 4:2010cv00839
Petitioner:
Atiim-Enahara Dyer-El
Respondent:
Timothy Torrence, Cynthia Herman, Steven R. Ohmer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nelson v. Joyce et al
as 4:2007cv01810
Petitioner:
Alexander Nelson
Respondent:
Jennifer Joyce, State of Missouri, Twenty-Second Judicial Circuit and U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
