General Cases filed in Pennsylvania
NDAULA v. DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00028
Respondent: United States Attorney For The Western District Of Pennsylvania, H. Quay, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner: Alexander Ndaula
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LAFOND v. SESSIONS et al
as 3:2018cv00200
Petitioner: RAOUL LAFOND
Respondent: WARDEN, JEFF SESSIONS and JOHN OBRIEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NDAULA v. DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 3:2018cv00137
Respondent: L. J. ODDO, H. QUAY, DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Petitioner: ALEXANDER NDAULA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SMALLEY v. SESSIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00407
Petitioner: JACK SMALLEY
Respondent: JEFF SESSIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL and PA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DETAR v. POMPEO et al
as 2:2018cv00369
Petitioner: LEE DETAR
Respondent: MIKE POMPEO, JAMES N. MATTIS, JOSH SHAPIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SOKHIEV v. SMITH et al
as 3:2017cv00209
Petitioner: BORIS SOKHIEV
Respondent: CHRISTIAN SMITH, KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, THOMAS D. HOMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DEBNATH v. SESSIONS et al
as 3:2017cv00195
Petitioner: APU CHANDRA DEBNATH
Respondent: JEFF SESSIONS , ELAINE DUKE , MICHAEL BORGEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SOKHIEV v. SMITH et al
as 3:2017cv00160
Petitioner: BORIS SOKHIEV
Respondent: CHRISTIAN SMITH, KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, THOMAS D. HOMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perez-Catalan v. Doll et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01427
Petitioner: Romulo Perez-Catalan
Respondent: Clair Doll , Jennifer Ritchey , Thomas D. Homan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?