Cases 1 - 10 of 274
Rose v. May
as 1:2024cv01037
Petitioner:
John R. Rose
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODLEY SR. v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2024cv01619
Petitioner:
Jamal F. Woodley Sr.
Respondent:
David C Young, John R. Cornely, Larry Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Long v. Warden, Pickaway Correctional Institution
as 1:2023cv00714
Petitioner:
John William Long
Respondent:
Warden, Pickaway Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Iden v. Warden Southeastern Correctional Institution
as 2:2023cv02525
Petitioner:
John J Iden
Respondent:
Warden Southeastern Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Picard v. Gray
as 1:2023cv01416
Petitioner:
John S. Picard
Respondent:
Warden David Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Swaney
as 2:2023cv00192
Petitioner:
Dustin Young
Defendant:
John R Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Swaney
as 1:2023cv00037
Petitioner:
Dustin Young
Defendant:
John R Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McClelland v. State of Ohio et al
as 5:2022cv01928
Petitioner:
Dennis McClelland, II
Respondent:
State of Ohio and John Doe Others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goff v. Foley
as 5:2022cv01437
Petitioner:
John Thomas Goff
Respondent:
Warden Keith J. Foley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matics et al v. Maier
as 5:2022cv01410
Petitioner:
James Matics, Phillip Shank, Perian Dargun and others
Respondent:
Sheriff George T. Maier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
