Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Lewis v. Warden Nance
as 8:2024cv02266
Petitioner:
Justin Jamal Lewis
Respondent:
Warden Nance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rose v. State of South Carolina et al
as 4:2023cv00130
Petitioner:
James Edward Rose, Jr.
Respondent:
State of South Carolina, Honorable D.L. Jefferson, Sheriff Duane Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rector v. Lewis et al
as 8:2023cv00011
Petitioner:
Seuvarrggio S Rector
Respondent:
Sheriff Lewis, Captain John Vandermosten and Warden of the Greenville County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Huntley v. York County
as 8:2022cv01679
Petitioner:
Victor Lewis Huntley
Respondent:
York County and Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. State of South Carolina
as 8:2020cv04418
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Jamie Ray Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis v. Unknown
as 8:2020cv03484
Petitioner:
Justin Jamal Lewis
Respondent:
Unknown and Warden of Kershaw Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brown v. Lewis
as 0:2020cv02035
Respondent:
Scott Lewis
Petitioner:
James A. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Turner v. FCI Edgefield
as 1:2020cv01238
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Edgefield
Petitioner:
Darwin Lewis Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gibson v. United States of America
as 9:2020cv00981
Petitioner:
Lewis Gibson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lewis v. Dobbs
as 0:2020cv00862
Petitioner:
Christopher Lewis
Respondent:
United States and Warden Bryan K. Dobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
