Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Rogers v. M.D.O.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Dontravian Rogers
Defendant:
M.D.O.C., Unknown Defendant, Unknown Hardin and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Jackson County et al
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Armond Lewis
Defendant:
Jackson County, David Futch, Keith Miller and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Miller v. G.C.R.C.F. et al
as 1:2022cv00351
Plaintiff:
Ray Charles Miller
Defendant:
G.C.R.C.F., Bobby C. Fairley, Burie Caine and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gardner v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2021cv00155
Petitioner:
Deunta Gardner
Respondent:
State of Mississippi and Warden James Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alvarez v. McAleenan et al
as 5:2019cv00123
Defendant:
Matthew Albence, U. S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, SHAWN GILLIS and others
Plaintiff:
Josep Ramirez Alvarez
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miller v. The State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2017cv00088
Petitioner:
Jamie L. Miller
Respondent:
The State of Mississippi and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Mosley
as 3:2016cv00435
Plaintiff:
Henry Earl Miller
Defendant:
B. Mosley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miller v. State of Mississippi et al
as 4:2015cv00132
Petitioner:
Steven Gregory Miller
Respondent:
State of Mississippi and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Denmark et al
as 3:2014cv00196
Petitioner:
Tarvarcus Miller
Respondent:
Denmark and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Fisher
as 3:2014cv00354
Plaintiff:
Henry Earl Miller
Defendant:
S. Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
