Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gerardo Mendoza Lopez v. Jeh Johnson, et al
as 14-16196
Petitioner - Appellee:
GERARDO MANUEL MENDOZA LOPEZ
Respondent - Appellant:
JEH JOHNSON, Secretary of Homeland Security, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, TIMOTHY S. AITKEN, Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Manuel Alejandro Lopez v. People of the State of Califorina
as 5:2012cv02224
Petitioner:
Manuel Alejandro Lopez
Respondent:
People of the State of Califorina
Olivares-Lopez v. Warden, FCC McRae
as 3:2012cv00066
Petitioner:
Manuel Olivares-Lopez
Respondent:
Walt Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Olivares-Lopez v. Warden, FCC McRae
as 5:2012cv00393
Petitioner:
Manuel Olivares-Lopez
Respondent:
Warden, FCC McRae
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Manuel Lopez v. Florida Department of Correcti
as 12-10445
Petitioner - Appellant:
MANUEL J. LOPEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Olivares-Lopez v. Warden, McRae Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2011cv00003
Petitioner:
Manuel Olivares-Lopez
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Corrections Corp. of America, McRae Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lopez v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2011cv20099
Plaintiff:
Manuel J. Lopez
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Manuel Gomez Lopez v. D. Runnels, et al
as 10-16921
Petitioner - Appellant:
MANUEL GOMEZ LOPEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
D. L. RUNNELS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Olivarez-Lopez v. United States of America
as 5:2010cv00310
Petitioner:
Manuel Olivarez-Lopez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Manuel Gomez Lopez v. D. Runnels, et al
as 08-17319
Petitioner - Appellant:
MANUEL GOMEZ LOPEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
D. L. RUNNELS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
