General Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Burgess v. Clendenion
as 1:2022cv00014
Petitioner: Phillip Matthew Burgess
Respondent: Jason Clendenion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hakoda v. Parris
as 3:2021cv00183
Petitioner: Matthew Hakoda
Respondent: Mike Parris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Whitehair v. Tennessee, State of et al
as 3:2020cv00917
Respondent: Ruth Woods, Tennessee, State of and Dena Davis
Petitioner: Matthew Whitehair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sealey v. State of Tennessee We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01277
Respondent: State of Tennessee
Petitioner: Matthew James Sealey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ludolf v. Owens We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv02078
Petitioner: Matthew R. Ludolf
Respondent: Warden A. M. Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Charles v. Kelton et al
as 3:2018cv00450
Petitioner: Matthew Otis Charles
Respondent: Louise W. Kelton, Jefferson B. Sessions and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Matthews v. Liebach et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01199
Petitioner: George W. Matthews
Respondent: Blair Liebach, Russel Washburn and Glenn R. Funk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Matthews v. Liebach et al
as 3:2017cv01375
Petitioner: George W. Matthews
Respondent: Blair Liebach, Russel Washburn and Glenn R. Funk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thompson v. State of Tennessee Department of Parole et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00212
Petitioner: Matthew Allen Thompson
Defendant: State of Tennessee Department of Parole and Herbert Slatery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Matthews v. Lee
as 3:2017cv00887
Petitioner: Martez D. Matthews
Respondent: Randy Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?