Cases 1 - 10 of 64
PHILLIPS v. PAULK
as 7:2023cv00101
Petitioner:
ERIC DEWAYNE PHILLIPS
Respondent:
ASHLEY PAULK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Unknown
as 3:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Phillips
Defendant:
Unknown
Respondent:
Judge Blackmon and Warden Victor Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vaughn v. State of GA et al
as 1:2022cv02885
Petitioner:
Phillip Jesse Vaughn
Respondent:
State of GA and Patrick Labat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lusk v. Barber et al
as 1:2022cv02315
Petitioner:
Justice Robert Lusk
Respondent:
Police Officer Barber, Police Officer Alberto Calderon, Police Officer Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hylander v. Warden, FCI Jesup
as 2:2022cv00044
Petitioner:
Phillip Hylander
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Phillips v. Maddox
as 1:2021cv04455
Petitioner:
Relonzo Phillips
Respondent:
Dekalb Count Sheriff Melody Maddox and Sherry Boston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Phillips v. Burgos
as 2:2021cv00089
Petitioner:
James Edward Phillups and James Edward Phillips
Respondent:
Acting Warden Burgos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Phillips v. Maddox
as 1:2020cv04836
Respondent:
Melody Maddox
Petitioner:
Relonzo Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Prescott v. Etheridge et al
as 1:2020cv03441
Respondent:
1996 Trial and Indictment No. Z-78909, Henry Malkin, Phillip Etheridge and others
Petitioner:
Lindberg Prescott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SNOWDEN v. DOE
as 1:2019cv00184
Respondent:
JOHN DOE
Petitioner:
STEVEN THOMAS SNOWDEN
Defendant:
JOHN I WALTON, KEITH DAY, LENA WREN JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
