Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rockett v. U.S. Probation Department
as 1:2022cv00664
Petitioner:
James Rockett
Respondent:
U.S. Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lenear v. Hanover County Probation Dpt.
as 1:2018cv00177
Petitioner:
Robert Lenear
Respondent:
Hanover County Probation Dpt.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nabaya v. Probation Dept. et al
as 3:2017cv00149
Petitioner:
Shapat Nabaya
Respondent:
Probation Dept. and Patricia Locket-Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Giles v. United States Probation/Pretrial
as 3:2014cv00370
Petitioner:
LaTosha Nicole Giles
Respondent:
United States Probation/Pretrial
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Salahmand v. Anthony et al
as 1:2012cv00493
Petitioner:
Mansour Salahmand
Respondent:
Peggy Anthony, Probation & Parole District 25 and Dept. of Community Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brooks v. United States of America et al
as 2:2011cv00555
Petitioner:
Anthony Eugene Brooks
Respondent:
United States of America, Federal Parole, Federal or State Probation until 2014 and Ernest Toney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Star v. Director of the Virginia Department of Corretions et al
as 7:2011cv00273
Respondent:
Director of the Virginia Department of Corretions and Director of the Virginia Office of Parole and Probation
Petitioner:
Michael Star
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner v. #18 District Probation and Parole Officer et al
as 7:2007cv00542
Petitioner:
Ray C. Turner
Respondent:
#18 District Probation and Parole Officer and Gail Hooker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crawley v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2006cv00388
Petitioner:
Rudolph Lee Crawley, Jr.
Respondent:
Department of Corrections, Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
