General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Laws v. Lumpkin
as 22-20010
Petitioner / Appellant: Randell Glen Laws
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Laws v. Lumpkin
as 4:2021cv03838
Petitioner: Randell Glen Laws
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Laws v. Lumpkin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv02754
Petitioner: Randell Glen Laws
Respondent: Director TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Randell Laws v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-20711
Petitioner - Appellant: RANDELL GLEN LAWS
Respondent - Appellee: LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Randell Laws v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-20295
Petitioner - Appellant: RANDELL GLEN LAWS
Respondent - Appellee: LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Laws v. Davis
as 4:2017cv01043
Petitioner: Randell Glen Laws
Respondent: Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Laws v. Stephens
as 4:2016cv00070
Petitioner: Randell Glen Laws
Respondent: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Randell Laws v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-20020
Petitioner - Appellant: RANDELL GLEN LAWS
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Randell Laws v. Rick Thaler, Director We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-20796
Petitioner - Appellant: RANDELL GLEN LAWS
Respondent - Appellee: RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Laws v. Quarterman
as 4:2007cv04472
Petitioner: Randell Glen Laws
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?