Cases 1 - 10 of 13
De Los Rios v. United States District Court
as 2:2022cv00969
Petitioner:
Paul Bryan De Los Rios
Respondent:
United States District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Kristich v. Rios et al
as 4:2022cv00174
Petitioner:
Orin Kristich
Respondent:
Melisa Rios, Unknown Party, Unknown Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Grigsby v. Howard et al
as 4:2021cv00266
Petitioner:
Philip Andra Grigsby
Respondent:
Catricia Howard, A Torres, G Merrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rios v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv01423
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
Anthony Lopez Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rios v. Ryan et al
as 4:2018cv00546
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles Ryan
Petitioner:
Maria Jesus Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rios v. Ryan
as 4:2018cv00548
Petitioner:
Maria Jesus Rios
Respondent:
Charles Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rios, Jr. #199527 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv01168
Petitioner:
Rafael Rios, Jr.
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rios-Esponiza v. Clay
as 4:2013cv00246
Petitioner:
Daniel Rios-Esponiza
Respondent:
Becky Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rios v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv00266
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Federico Olivas Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
De Los Rios # 220280 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2012cv00839
Petitioner:
Paul Bryan De Los Rios
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
