Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Rivers v. Jamison
as 1:2021cv01409
Petitioner:
Virgil Rivers
Respondent:
J.L. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ACKERMAN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 1:2021cv00091
Petitioner:
JONATHAN E. ACKERMAN and JONATHAN JASON BARTOSEK
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPT. OF MONROE CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX-TWIN RIVERS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WARREN COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rivers Bey v. Howard
as 1:2020cv01576
Respondent:
Warden C. Howard
Petitioner:
Virgil Rivers Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FLOYD et al v. PITTSBURGH BUREAU OF POLICE et al
as 2:2020cv00931
Respondent:
TOM WOLF, ORLANDO HARPER, PITTSBURGH BUREAU OF POLICE and others
Petitioner:
River Silverelk, Laura Michelle Schlemmer, FREDERICK BANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rivers Bey v. Perdue
as 3:2017cv00173
Petitioner:
Virgil Rivers Bey
Respondent:
R. A. Perdue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RIVERS v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PA
as 2:2013cv03109
Petitioner:
MICHAEL RIVERS
Respondent:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rivers v. S.C.I. Huntingdon Prison
as 1:2012cv02620
Plaintiff:
Frederick Rivers
Defendant:
S.C.I. Huntingdon Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIVERS et al v. BICKELL et al
as 2:2012cv03417
Petitioner:
FREDERICK RIVERS
Respondent:
TABB BICKELL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF SETH R. WILLIAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rivers v. McGrady
as 3:2012cv00195
Petitioner:
Thomas Rivers
Respondent:
James McGrady and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RIVERS et al v. LAWLER et al
as 2:2010cv04211
Petitioner:
FREDERICK RIVERS
Respondent:
ROBERT LAWLER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF SETH R. WILLIAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF THOMAS CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
