General Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Terrell v. Eller
as 1:2024cv01143
Petitioner: Roger Terrell
Defendant: Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Cooper et al
as 3:2024cv00208
Petitioner: James K Taylor
Respondent: Bryan K Antonelli, Chief Cooper and Roger D. Wilson Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taylor v. Cooper et al
as 3:2024mc00018
Petitioner: James K Taylor
Respondent: Bryan K Antonelli, Chief Cooper and Roger D. Wilson Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rogers v. Strada et al
as 2:2023cv02630
Petitioner: Mandon Rogers
Respondent: Frank Strada, Brandon Watwood and Johnathan Skrmetti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Lemaster We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01026
Petitioner: Hrondy Tarvus Rogers
Respondent: Warden David Lemaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Price v. Rogers
as 2:2021cv02473
Petitioner: Willie Price
Respondent: Samuel Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Maples v. Rogers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00179
Respondent: Sam Rogers
Petitioner: Charles Travis Maples
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Rogers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv02230
Respondent: Sammy Rogers and Warden Douglas Williams
Petitioner: Brandon Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tumlin v. Rogers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00058
Petitioner: Reginald D. Tumlin
Respondent: Sammy Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tumlin v. Rogers
as 1:2021cv01043
Petitioner: Reginald D. Tumlin
Respondent: Sammy Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?