Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Figueroa Garcia v. Zodak
as 1:2023cv11432
Petitioner:
Werner Figueroa Garcia
Respondent:
Scott Zodak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. The Community Resource of Justice et al
as 1:2023cv10168
Defendant:
The Community Resource of Justice, The Coolidge House and Phamatech Laboratories, Inc
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott
Respondent:
Amy Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Yancey v. Warden FMC Devens
as 1:2022cv11790
Plaintiff:
Edward Scott Yancey
Defendant:
Warden FMC Devens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wood v. Boncher
as 1:2022cv11436
Petitioner:
Dale Scott Wood
Respondent:
Amy Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wallace v. Pliler
as 1:2022cv10758
Petitioner:
Timi Y. Wallace
Respondent:
William Scott Pliler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Liviz Sr. v. Supreme Judicial Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2019cv10393
Defendant:
Honorable Justice Scott L. Kafker, Honorable Justice Frank M. Gaziano, Honoralbe Justice Elspeth B. Cypher and others
Plaintiff:
Chief Jurist Ilya Liviz Sr. and Baby Jurist Ilyan Liviz Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mattingly v. Warden Spaulding et al
as 1:2018cv12299
Petitioner:
Robert Scott Mattingly
Respondent:
Warden Spaulding and M. Tidwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mattingley v. Spalding
as 1:2018cv11569
Petitioner:
Robert Scott Mattingley
Respondent:
Spalding and Capt S. Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robinson v. Obama
as 3:2016cv30077
Plaintiff:
Scott Robinson
Defendant:
Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fraize v. Hollingsworth
as 1:2016cv10626
Petitioner:
Donald Scott Fraize, II
Respondent:
J. Hollingsworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
