Cases 1 - 10 of 118
Justise v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00477
Petitioner:
Charles E Justise, Sr
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DUNN v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00191
Petitioner:
ADRIAN L. DUNN, SR.
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cochran v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00121
Petitioner:
Michael J Cochran, Sr and Michael Cochran, Sr
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Khonsu El v. Sheriff
as 1:2023cv00288
Petitioner:
Selah Khonsu El and Lamar James Wilson, Sr.
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COBB v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2023cv01216
Petitioner:
MARSHALL COBB, SR.
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CANTU v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 1:2023cv01134
Petitioner:
ANTONIO CANTU, SR.
Respondent:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JUSTISE v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv00877
Petitioner:
CHARLES E. JUSTISE, SR.
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kuspa v. Sheriff
as 3:2023cv00350
Petitioner:
Adam Christopher Kuspa, Sr
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chatman v. Sheriff
as 3:2023cv00342
Petitioner:
Albert O.M. Chatman, Sr
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cantu v. Warden
as 2:2023cv00128
Petitioner:
Antonio Cantu, Sr and Antonio Cantu
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
