Cases 1 - 10 of 30
EDWARDS v. STATE OF NJ
as 3:2014cv05969
Petitioner:
ROBERT EDWARDS
Respondent:
STATE OF NJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COLEMAN v. E.J.S.P. et al
as 2:2014cv05390
Petitioner:
KAREEM COLEMAN
Respondent:
E.J.S.P., THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NJ and PATRICK NOGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2014cv04026
Petitioner:
CHARLES E. SMITH
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, WARDEN ATLANTIC COUNTY JAIL and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KUSHNER v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2014cv03709
Petitioner:
LARRY J. KUSHNER
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and STATE OF NJ PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RULLAN v. BALICKI et al
as 1:2011cv04497
Petitioner:
ANTHONY RULLAN
Respondent:
ROBERT M. BALICKI, CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL, SUPERIOR COURT OF NJ- CUMBERLAND COUNTY- CRIMINAL DIVISION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Keith Capers v. State of NJ, et al
as 11-2202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH CAPERS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NJ and CRAIG CONWAY
Richard Roche, et al v. State of New Jersey Legislatur, et al
as 11-1198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD ROCHE
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
FELIX ROCHE and ABDIEL AVILA
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY LEGISLATURE, STATE OF NJ, DEPT OF CORR and others
Dudley Rue v. Donald Mee, et al
as 11-1046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DUDLEY RUE
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD MEE and STATE OF NJ PROSECUTOR OFFICE
Henry Poole v. State of NJ, et al
as 10-3601
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY POOLE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NJ, ATTY GEN NJ and KANDELL
Robert Dove v. State of NJ, et al
as 10-2407
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT A. DOVE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NJ and WARDEN EAST JERSEY STATE PRISON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
