Cases 1 - 9 of 9
(HC) Sedlar v. Sacramento County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00132
Petitioner:
Robert Wayne Sedlar
Respondent:
Sacramento County Jail, Sacramento County Sheriff and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) McCoy v. Sacramento County Jail
as 2:2022cv02182
Petitioner:
Jerome Eli McCoy
Respondent:
Sacramento County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) McCoy v. Sacramento County Jail
as 2:2022cv01770
Petitioner:
Jerome McCoy and Jerome Eli McCoy
Respondent:
Sacramento County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miramon v. Sacramento County Jail
as 2:2016cv00779
Petitioner:
Armando Miramon
Respondent:
Sacramento County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allara v. Old Folsom State Prison et al
as 2:2008cv02051
Petitioner:
Anthony Allara
Respondent:
Old Folsom State Prison and Sacramento County Jail
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Allara v. Old Folsom State Prison et al
as 3:2008cv03027
Petitioner:
Anthony Allara
Respondent:
Old Folsom State Prison and Sacramento County Jail
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Corrow v. Sacramento County Sheriff et al
as 2:2008cv00388
Petitioner:
Neil Donald Corrow
Respondent:
Sacramento County Sheriff, Sacramento County Jail and Sacramento County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. United States of America et al
as 2:2007cv02387
Petitioner:
Lavell Rondell Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America, John R Simpson, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cozac v. Sacramento County Jail
as 2:2007cv01628
Petitioner:
Ovidili Cozac
Respondent:
Sacramento County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
