Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Adams v. South Carolina Dept of Corrections
as 8:2023cv06143
Petitioner:
Brandon Adams
Respondent:
South Carolina Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Liverman v. South Carolina Dept. of Corrections
as 9:2023cv03205
Petitioner:
Chris Anthony Liverman
Respondent:
South Carolina Dept. of Corrections and Warden of Tallahatchie County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. South Carolina Dept. of Corrections
as 1:2019cv02176
Respondent:
South Carolina Dept. of Corrections
Petitioner:
Eugene Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vaughn v. South Carolina Dept of Corrections
as 1:2017cv03449
Petitioner:
Jerome A. Vaughn
Respondent:
South Carolina Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Housey v. South Carolina Dept of Corrections
as 5:2016cv00019
Petitioner:
Dwayne Housey
Respondent:
South Carolina Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Al-Haqq v. Cohen et al
as 2:2015cv01387
Petitioner:
Bilal A Al-Haqq
Respondent:
Lavern Cohen and South Carolina Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Poe v. South Carolina Dept of Corrections
as 9:2014cv02909
Petitioner:
Richard Keith Poe
Respondent:
South Carolina Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hamilton v. South Carolina Dept of Correction et al
as 5:2013cv02506
Petitioner:
Thomas Curtis Hamilton
Respondent:
South Carolina Dept of Correction and William Byars
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Porter v. South Carolina Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv03416
Petitioner:
Darry Lynn Porter
Respondent:
South Carolina Dept of Corrections and William R Byars
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McFadden v. South Carolina Dept of Corrections
as 6:2011cv01444
Petitioner:
Paul Weary McFadden, Jr
Respondent:
South Carolina Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
