Cases 1 - 10 of 704
Weinert v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
Steven Alexander Weinert
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. Ledbetter
as 6:2023cv00433
Petitioner:
Joshua Duane Butler
Respondent:
The State of Oklahoma and Kevin Ledbetter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2023cv00533
Petitioner:
David George Clark
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. State of Oklahoma
as 5:2023cv01096
Petitioner:
Henry Lee Hunter
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zodoq-El v. State of Oklahoma
as 5:2023cv01088
Petitioner:
Nanya Maluk Zodoq-El
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma, Department of Corrections and Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2023cv00396
Petitioner:
Joshua Duane Butler
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2023cv00442
Petitioner:
Maurice Lajuan Thompson
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. State of Oklahoma
as 23-6101
Petitioner / Appellant:
PRENTISS MORRIS
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Bruner v. The State of Oklahoma
as 5:2023cv00659
Petitioner:
Jamele R Bruner
Respondent:
The State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luginbyhl v. Rankins
as 4:2023cv00279
Petitioner:
Levi McRae Luginbyhl
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma and William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
