Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Brailford v. State of Maryland
as 1:2024cv00568
Petitioner:
Michael T. Brailford
Respondent:
State of Maryland and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Coulbourn
as 1:2023cv03390
Petitioner:
Lamont M. Smith
Respondent:
T. Coulbourn and Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinley v. Bivens
as 1:2023cv00681
Petitioner:
Gary T. McKinley
Respondent:
Carlos D. Bivens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Womack v. Armstead et al
as 1:2022cv02618
Petitioner:
Jesus T. Womack
Respondent:
Laura Armstead and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis, Jr. v. Perkins
as 1:2022cv02542
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
Clifton T. Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RafaEl v. Abelto et al
as 1:2022cv01948
Petitioner:
Raaj RafaEl
Respondent:
Warden Frederick T. Abelto and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alvarez v. Weber et al
as 1:2021cv01892
Petitioner:
Bruman Alvarez
Respondent:
Warden R.S. Weber and Secretary Stephen T. Moyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reeves v. Fogan et al
as 1:2021cv01509
Respondent:
Marion Fogan and Clifford T. Perkins Hospital Center
Petitioner:
Junior Lee Reeves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. Clifton T. Perkins et al
as 1:2020cv02676
Respondent:
The Attorney General Of The State Of Maryland and Clifton T. Perkins
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Walker v. Bishop et al
as 8:2020cv01076
Defendant:
Warden Frank B Bishop and Maryland Attorney General
Petitioner:
Najarred T. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
