Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Perry v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center Prosecutor's Office et al
as 2:2023cv02762
Petitioner:
Courtney Perry
Respondent:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center Prosecutor's Office, Debbie Nichols, Bill Odom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bobo v. Bowers et al
as 2:2023cv02498
Petitioner:
Travis D. Bobo
Respondent:
Freddie Bowers, C. Peters, T. D. Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McKinney v. Bowers et al
as 2:2023cv02437
Petitioner:
Charles E. McKinney
Respondent:
F. J. Bowers, C. Peters, T. D. Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Champion v. Leeds
as 1:2023cv01123
Petitioner:
Dwight T. Champion
Respondent:
Chance Leeds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cantu v. Bowers et al
as 2:2023cv02376
Petitioner:
Oziel Cantu
Respondent:
F. J. Bowers, C. Peters, T.D. Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fields v. Bower et al
as 2:2023cv02336
Petitioner:
Winfred Fields
Respondent:
F. J. Bower, C. Peters, T. D. Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Transou v. Clendenion
as 1:2023cv01023
Petitioner:
Micah T. Transou
Respondent:
Warden Jason Clendenion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Denton v. Boyd
as 2:2022cv02035
Petitioner:
Raymond T. Denton
Respondent:
Bert Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Houston v. Owens
as 2:2021cv02203
Respondent:
Warden Owens, M. Avant, D. Samuel and others
Petitioner:
Eric Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Collins v. Watson
as 1:2020cv00349
Respondent:
J T Watson
Petitioner:
Larry Joe Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
