Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Lozano-Quezada v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2019cv00721
Petitioner:
Manuel Lozano-Quezada
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Forbes et al
as 4:2017cv00418
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Kelly Forbes, US Marshals Service, Mark Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Haley v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2014cv03474
Petitioner:
Samuel E Haley, Jr
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons , Deborah Leff and Maria Rustin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pinson a/k/a Grace Pinson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 6:2014cv03461
Petitioner:
Jeremy Pinson a/k/a Grace Pinson
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Porter v. U.S. Marshals Service et al
as 4:2014cv00176
Petitioner:
August B. Porter
Respondent:
U.S. Marshals Service and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mackovich v. Richardson et al
as 6:2013cv03127
Petitioner:
John Vincent Mackovich
Respondent:
Richardson, Eric Holder and Federal Bureau of Prisons Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 6:2012cv03331
Petitioner:
Michael L Johnson
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McKinney v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2012cv01044
Petitioner:
Jimmie Darrell McKinney
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
EMBREY v. SAMUELS et al
as 6:2012cv03235
Movant:
William J.R. Embrey
Respondent:
CHARLES SAMUELS, JR and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2011cv01282
Petitioner:
James Tyrone Smith
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, US Probation Office of Western District of Missouri and Kansas City Community Center/Residential Re-Entry Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
