Cases 1 - 10 of 116
Traylor v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
Tony Traylor, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cervantes v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00293
Petitioner:
Tony Cervantes
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Traylor v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Tony Traylor, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weaver v. Parker et al
as 6:2023cv00454
Petitioner:
Dianne L. Weaver, Philip J. Emerson, Jr. and P J Emerson
Respondent:
Jerry Parker and Alfonso Charles
Defendant:
Kelly Cole, Holly Lake Ranch Association (HLRA), Patty Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Casey v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03998
Petitioner:
Tony Henry Casey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Browning v. USA
as 3:2023cv01882
Petitioner:
Tony Demon Browning
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Casey v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03118
Petitioner:
Tony H Casey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. Lumpkin
as 1:2022cv01141
Petitioner:
Tony Ramirez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simmons v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2022cv00446
Petitioner:
Tony Simmons
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ramirez v. Lumpkin
as 1:2022cv01199
Petitioner:
Tony Ramirez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
